Friday, 24 February 2017

The Problem with Simon West as a director

The problems with Simon West’s films

There are many great action filmmakers such as John McTiernan, who has given us many great action film such as Die Hard and also The Hunt for Red October, also another great action filmmaker would be someone like John Woo who has also made some great action films such as Hard Boiled and the original Bullet to the Head. However, there are some action directors who make action films which are not that great. Simon West is an action director, and his has been around since 1997 with his mainstream live-action directional debut with Con Air. West would go on to make the video game adaptation Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, and his later stuff that he has made would include the Expendables 2 and Wild Card. All these films have got similar styles in direction with the action. There are some things that he should acknowledge to improve on his action filmmaking. West is not a bad filmmaker; he is not like other action directors in Hollywood at the moment, but like other directors he can make some improvements with his filmmaking.

Editing

The first issue that Simon West has during his action sequences, the first issue with the films that West produces is that the editing in his films cause the problems. The editing makes the action hard to follow in his films, this is something which can be seen in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and the first action sequence that happens in this film. The scene takes place inside the house of Lara Croft, the action is filmed in an open space and therefore the action should be easy to follow. However, the first action sequence that takes place is very difficult to follow and this is due to the editing in this scene. For some reason, West has decided to use tight close-ups and medium shots for this scene. This is something which makes it hard to follow and leaves the audience confused because there is no shot here to establish what each character is doing in the action scene. In this sequence, West should have used the same approach as many other action directors such as Paul Greengrass and the late Tony Scott. These are directors make entertaining action films but while both use different styles but there are some similar features. Both Greengrass and Scott use chaos motion in their action scenes. This is where there is a lot of items happening in the frame but the directors use a technique which helps the audience understand the action.

Camerawork

Both Greengrass and Scott use a close up shot of the either the protagonist and there a shot of the antagonist(s) and then gives the audience another shot of the other characters. But the most important thing is that in the editing the directors will cut to a wide shot. This is done throughout the action scenes, this is something which makes the action nice and easy to follow. However, West doesn’t use this technique because in his action scenes are either close-up shots or medium shots. However, this is not the only issue with the editing, West has certain issues with something else when editing his action scenes, there is something which he does quite a lot of. Great action directors such as John McTiernan, McTiernan is someone who is a great action director because he takes time to establish where each of the characters are onscreen. This is something that the audience can see in the film Predator. Before the first action scene takes place, Arnold’s team are established in one location, but the camerawork allows the audience to understand where the antagonistic forces are in this scene. The action scene is well set up before the action begins. However, this is something that Simon West doesn’t do that well when there is more than one antagonist against the protagonist. This is something which happens in a lot of his films including Wild Card, the characters are not established and the audience doesn’t understand where each character is, and this poor action geography.

The final aspect that is wrong with Simon West’s films, is not only an issue with his work but also some another filmmakers and it is not just something that occurs in Simon West films. Lighting is very important for clarity with the visual aspects, it allows the audience to see what happens onscreen. Action filmmakers in particular have decided that poorly lit action sequences, there are many action directors who do this and an example would be the recent Hitman: Agent 47, the opening action sequence and the final action sequence are poorly lit and this is something that happen because the cast and crew don’t know how to effectively shoot an action scene to cover up the stunt doubles in scene and to cover the fact that the action is not convincing. With Simon West, this happens in some of his films an example of this would be The Expendables 2. The Expendables 2 is probably West’s best work because the action sequences are somewhat easy to follow, however the final action scene are something which is the worst. The sequence that happens between Scott Adkins’ character and Jason Statham’s character, this is something which has been poorly lit and the audience can’t see what each character is doing. This is a shame because both of these actors can do their own stunts and both actors have done other films where they have committed themselves to the action. Statham has done the Transporter trilogy and Adkins has done films such as Unleashed and Undisputed 2 and he has done his own stunts and committed himself to the action.

Conclusion

However, in The Expendables 2 the action sequence between both characters is not lit like the other scenes and this is due to the fact that the actors aren’t the ones that actually doing the action on set. The lighting is hiding the fact that they are using stunt doubles, and the only reason they have done this is because each actor had a busy schedule and the actors couldn’t be on set to film the action scenes. This is something which is shame because the action scene between these two action stars should have been done with clarity and good geography. Simon West is not a bad filmmaker and most of his films are enjoyable to watch, but his films have poor editing and poor lighting in some of his scenes. The most critical area is the poor editing with the action scenes because the audience needs to understand where the protagonist and the antagonist are in relation to one another in the action sequences. This is something that all the action filmmakers should learn, this is because there are key aspects that all action films should understand and copy because an audience should have much better quality films than the action films that are being released at the moment.  


No comments:

Post a Comment