Sunday, 26 February 2017

Top 10 worst Hollywood action films

Top 10 worst Hollywood action films

The action film is one of the hardest genres to get right because the director and the cast have to focus on making the action sequences very easy to follow and make the action look impactful as well. There are many great examples of action films but for every Terminator 2: Judgement Day, John Wick or Mad Max: Fury Road there are a lot of action films which are great but while those examples were covered on a post yesterday in a blog post, today this post will cover the action films which are not the best but the worst examples in the genre. These are action films which have terrible narratives, terrible action sequences alongside bad directing and editing. This list will exclude superhero films because the worst superhero films will be covered in a separate list because superhero films standalone and this is a list which focus on pure action films and not films which have comic book characters and storylines. Also like the list that was published yesterday there can only be one entry per franchise.
10. Terminator Genisys (Alan Taylor, 2015).
The first two entries in the terminator films are well directed and have great action sequences and after the second film, James Cameron stepped away from the franchise went downhill. The third entry while passable was nowhere need the standard of the first two films. After this there was Terminator Salvation which didn’t have many redeemable qualities. However, the studios decided to make another entry into the franchise, the latest entry would be Terminator Genisys. Terminator Genisys is directed by Alan Taylor and stars Arnold Schwarzenegger, Emilia Clarke, Jai Courtney and Jason Clarke. This film has a very confusing narrative that makes it very hard to follow, Kyle Reese is sent back to 1984 to find out that Sarah Connor is the character from the second film because the timeline has changed. The film re-writes the narratives of the original film and the sequel Judgement Day. Then for no reason the film jumps to 2017 and the rest of the film takes place in this time zone instead. The script is awfully written and the script hasn’t had enough attention to make sure that there weren’t any plot holes with the narrative. The acting is bad and when looking at the director and the cast because the director has done multiple Game of thrones episodes and Emilia Clarke has been Game of Thrones. However, the worst aspect by far would be that the action is terrible, the action is very difficult to follow with the hand-to-hand combat sequences are very difficult to follow because of the editing and cuts between the action and this might be because neither Schwarzenegger and Jason Clarke can’t do stunts and this shows during the action. This is poor entry into the Terminator Franchise and the studios should give the rights back to Cameron so that we can finally get a sequel to Terminator 2: Judgement Day and make a decent film that keeps the audience entertained, and the reason for this would be because we deserve better than Terminator Genisys.

9. Taken 3 (Olivier Megaton, 2015).

Like the previous entry this is to cash in a box office successful franchise, Taken and Taken 2 were very successful at the box office. The first Taken film is a mediocre action film which has some interesting elements but the action at time is quite difficult to follow at times. But Taken 2 has some really bad action sequences but due to the box office success the film, 20th Century Fox decided that they should make a sequel because of the low risk and high profit films. Taken 3 is directed by Olivier Megaton who is not a competent action director, he has made other films such as Transporter 3 and Colombiana, this is by far the worst example of his directing style. The action sequences are some of the worst ever to be put on film because Megaton likes to use this quick cut editing style to make the action seem more impactful. An example would be when Neeson’s character goes on the run, there is a sequence which sees the character jump a fence, the sequence uses fourteen cuts in two seconds and this is simply too fast for the human brain to focus on what is going on during the action sequence. The other issue is that the action sequences are not very well thought out when they are being filmed because Megaton has no idea about establishing the characters and the geography of the characters and this is what separates a bad action film from a good action film. Megaton is director that didn’t put much effort when making Taken 3 and if you would like to watch a film where the main character is framed for murder and must go on the run then you would be better off watching The Fugitive because this is a watered down version of that film. Taken

8. G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra (Steven Sommers, 2009)

G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra is a film which tries to capitalise on the carton series which came out in 90’s. G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra is directed by Steven Sommers and stars Dennis Quaid, Christopher Eccleston, Channing Tatum and Sienna Miller. The film is about an elite military unit comprised of special operatives known as G.I. Joe, operating out of The Pit, takes on an evil organization led by a notorious arms dealer. The film is a very bad example of an action film, the first thing is that the performances are very bad in this film because it seems like the actors and director couldn’t care about this film. The acting is quite bad, however one of the worst aspect of this film would be that the CGI is terrible, there are two reasons for this, the first reason would be that the CGI has this artificial look to it and this means that the CGI seems fake and you understand that the special effects are just are bunch of computers programming images onscreen. The second reason would be that the people who render these effects haven’t blended them into the live-action elements very well. However, the worst thing about this film by far would be the action sequences, the action sequences are bad, they aren’t that had to follow but there is no geography established between any of the characters and in one sequence in France there are couple of security guards appear, they appear out of nowhere and then Storm Shadow uses his Ninja Stars at them and he with them before they appear onscreen. But besides this the action feels bland and dull, this is because what is put onscreen doesn’t look very well shot or directed and the action doesn’t break any new ground. G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra is not the worst action film but there could have been more effort put into the film because the film that we received wasn’t very good. The only good points in this film would be Dennis Quaid and the over the top performance that is delivered by Christopher Eccleston. These are the only two things to like about this film.  

7. The Transporter Refueled (Camille Delamarre, 2015).

The first trilogy of the Transporter series are films which are passable, the first-two films in the series are mindless action films which are well done, and while the third film is not the greatest the film has Jason Statham. However, 20th Century Fox decided to reboot the franchise in 2015 and therefore they released The Transporter Refueled was directed by Camille Delamarre, and the film stars Ed Skrein and Ray Stevenson. The film takes place in the south of France, former special-ops mercenary Frank Martin enters into a game of chess with a femme-fatale and her three sidekicks who are looking for revenge against a sinister Russian kingpin. The director Camille Delamarre is mainly an editor who has edited films such as Transporter 3, Taken 2 and Colombiana and has only one another directing credit and that would be Brick Mansion that came out a couple of years ago. Transporter Refueled is a poor example of the genre, the main issue would be that the script has not been written with much care and attention with the film having characters which are very one dimensional and the characters make poor decisions that would get killed in the real world. The second issue would be that Ed Skrein is not Jason Statham and this shows because the director and editor have to edit around the actors that are involved in the action sequences. The editing is something which is poorly done in this film because the director doesn’t show us what the characters are doing at any one time during the action sequences. This is can be seen in the final fight sequence, there is this quick cuts which cuts away from the action and the actors are not hitting each other or the filmmakers are making the impacts of the hits much firmer than what happened on set. The Transporter Refueled is a film which is terrible, if you thought that Transporter 3 was a bad film this is film which is much worse than that film. The only good aspect to this film would be that Ray Stevenson is the only good thing about this film, but even considering that he is wasted in this film because the rest of the film is terrible.

6. Hitman: Agent 47 (Aleksander Bach, 2015).

Hitman: Agent 47 is the second attempt to trying to make another film about the Hitman character on the big screen. Hitman: Agent 47 is directed by Aleksander Bach and the film stars Rupert Friend, Hannah Ware and Zachary Quinto. The film is about the assassin agent 47 who teams up with a woman named Katia to help her find her father and uncover the mysteries of her ancestry, while agent 47 tries to take down an evil organisation known as the Syndicate. The first film was critically panned for having a confusing narrative which was hard to follow and the film had too many villains in the narrative. This is the second attempt to make a good film and the creative team behind this film have failed to make a good Hitman film. There are many reason that this film fails because of several different factors, the first would be the script, 20th century fox decided to get screenwriter Skip Woods, the man responsible for the script in the original in the first film. This new version of the Hitman film has a poor script because none of the characters get much development, an example would be the subway fight between agent 47 and John Smith. The script doesn’t give the audience strong character development and therefore the audience doesn’t care if the characters survive during the action sequences. The action sequences are also quite poorly filmed, an example would be the first action sequence that takes place in the film, the filmmakers just decide that the character should aim a weapon at any angle and this is so the shots look good and this is not what makes a great action film.

5. 2 Fast 2 Furious (John Singleton, 2003).

2 Fast 2 Furious is a sequel to The Fast and The Furious and is yet another sequel to a very successful film just like Taken 3. 2 Fast 2 Furious is directed by John Singleton and stars Paul Walker and also Tyrese Gibson. The film sees Paul Walker’s character return to the franchise in Miami after the events of the first film. The former cop Brian O'Conner is called upon to bust a dangerous criminal and he recruits the help of a former childhood friend and street racer who has a chance to redeem himself, and take down a drug dealer. This is a film which has terrible cinematography, the cinematography and the camera that the production crew decided to use a camera which is of low quality and this is something which makes the film look terrible from the start to the end of the film. This is film which is very uncomfortable to watch because the film crew didn’t care about the aesthetic of the film and this shows in the overall film itself. The film is just unpleasant to watch from start to finish and this is not only due to the aesthetic of the film, but because the CGI is very poor and the artists who render the films special effects have done a very poor job or the special effects have been rushed to make sure that the film was completed on time so that the studio could make money. The film is not the worst film on the list, the action is very easy to follow and Paul Walker is quite good in this film. But the reason why the film ranks in the middle is because of the aesthetics of the film and the visuals. This is an uncomfortable film to watch because of the visual elements and while the other films listed before a worse, they have been well shot and don’t have poor technical aspects, and because of this the film would ranks here because of the visuals.

4. A Good Day to Die hard (John Moore, 2013).

Every aspect of this film is poor, this is a film which should have never have been made because they shouldn’t have made this sequel and stuck with four films, but it seems like that 20th Century Fox don’t care about putting out quality action films because this is there fourth entry on this list. Die Hard 4.0 or Live Free or Die Hard was a passable and entertaining action film but where that film had some good sequences and an entertaining plot. This film is not entertaining at all; this film is horrible from start to finish because there are many things to pick holes with about this film. The first thing is that all the characters are terrible, and this includes McLane as a character, he is not the same character as the one in the original film and he is a complete asshole who doesn’t care for human life, and this is not the same character as the first film because he cared about the people. But he is no better than the antagonists in the film and that means you don’t care about the survival of the main protagonist and this is basic screenwriting you must make the character someone who sympathetic and that you can support even when they make questionable decisions. This film gives us characters which make stupid choices that effect other people and put people endanger and this just includes the main character. The action sequences have been edited by an ape because the action is bad, hard to follow and very badly filmed and shot choices show that the director is an incompetent person and he shouldn’t be allowed to direct any more films. The script is also terrible, it was written by Skip Woods who makes his second mention on this post, the script writer doesn’t understand the concept of how to write characters and how to develop them and Die Hard 5 suffers greatly from this for that reason.

3. Hot Pursuit (Anne Fletcher, 2015).  

From a bad sequel to a very bad film in general, Hot Pursuit is an insult of a film, Hot Pursuit is about an uptight and by-the-book cop tries to protect the outgoing widow of a drug boss as they race through Texas pursued by crooked cops and murderous gunmen. This is quite a good premise but the final product is terrible for many different reasons, the first reason would be that the lead characters are both terrible. Reese Witherspoon has been in some excellent films such as Walk the Line and Sofia Vergara is actresses has had some interesting roles like in Machete Kills and Wild Card. However, in this film they are both uncomfortable to watch throughout the run time in the film because they make jokes which are unfunny. The jokes are either about shoes, clothes or personal issues and this film makes jokes about these areas and jokes about these topics are not funny because they just decide to make these random jokes. This film is also terrible with the pacing and can’t decide whether it wants to be an action film like the buddy cop action film of the 1980’s or whether it wants to be a spoof film about that genre. The action is completely terrible with no structure and no build the action just occurs from nowhere and this is what makes a terrible action film. Hot Pursuit is a film which is waste of time and this is film that nobody should watch, the film is uncomfortable to watch from beginning to end. There is nothing redeemable about this film because there is nothing to like about this film from this film, this is a film that has already been forgotten and this is good thing because this is a film which deserves to be forgotten and not remembered.

2. Getaway (Courtney Solomon, 2013).

Not to be confused with the Sam Peckinpah classic which is an excellent film, this film Getaway is directed by Courtney Solomon and stars Ethan Hawke, Selena Gomez and Jon Voight. The film has a very confusing plot to follow and this but one issue with the film, but the film follows the character of Brent Magna who must save his kidnapped wife from an antagonist which is known as the voice. This is a film which is like watching a police pursuit as a film and this film is 90 minutes, so the film is basically a 90-minute car chase and that is all this film is. The film follows the main character and another character known as the kid played by Selena Gomez, they are both sent on a quest to help the antagonist achieve his goals. The narrative is very limited and this makes it weak and this can’t carry the run time of one hour and thirty minutes. The only thing which is a positive about this film would be that Ethan Hawke tries to make the most of this film and Jon Voight is quite interesting as the antagonist but the filmmakers don’t capitalise on these talented individuals. This film could have been a mindless action film which you could watch and switch your brain off to watch but this film is basically two characters in a car playing a series games at the antagonists demands and this is terrible film, and people should stay away from watching this film because the film is not really a film but more a series of clips taken from other films car chase sequence and then edited together to make it look like a film and this is all this film will be. Like the previous entry this film came out in 2013 and nobody ever talks about this film at all and this is something which is good, this film is better to be forgotten because there are better examples of films like this and while it is not great Need for Speed is a much better film compared to this film.

1. Transformers: Age of Extinction (Michael Bay, 2014).

Constructing this list was hard because of which Transformers film to put on here, apart from the first film in the franchise is not great but the film is a passable, but the other films are all terrible. Possibly the worst out film out of the series would be Transformers: Age of Extinction. Transformers: Age of Extinction is directed by Michael Bay and stars Mark Wahlberg, Nicole Peltz and Stanley Tucci. The film takes place five years after the events of Dark of the Moon, and the Transformers are being hunted by the government agency because they agencies think they did the damage to Chicago, even though they are hunting the wrong Transformers because the Deception and not the Autobots. This film is bad for many different reasons; the first reason would be that all the action that doesn’t evolve any CGI is very poorly filmed and you can’t understand what is happening onscreen and this is because of Bay’s directing style because he likes motion in all kinds of shots the camera is constantly shaking. The second aspect is that the film has a terrible plot and storyline which has many plot holes and inconsistencies with the other films in the franchise. The third reason would be that this film is a bad action film would be that the acting is behind believable and there is not one strong performance in this film, although Mark Wahlberg is fine in this film and probably gives the best performance in this film but that is not saying much compared to the other performances in this film. The final reason that this film is bad is that this film is too long and it is not an entertaining to watch, the film is near three hour run time and the action is above all boring to watch and doesn’t look good onscreen. This film is at the number one spot because of the box office success this film had, with the film making over $1 billion and this is because people just go and see the film because of the trailers and because of this film’s success we are going to get another three sequels to this awful film, and hopefully Bay doesn’t direct anymore after The last Knight because we should get better films than the ones we are getting from Bay.


No comments:

Post a Comment